SegWit vs Native SegWit (Bech32) : A Comprehensive Guide –

SegWit vs Native SegWit (Bech32) A Comprehensive Guide

Before continuing our debate about SegWit vs Native SegWit (Bech32), let us learn about the fundamentals of segregated witness addressing, abbreviated as SegWit, and native segregated witness addressing, otherwise known as Bech32 or Native SegWit.

While adding a Bitcoin account, ledger users are usually given two options at the outset. The first is native SegWit and the second is SegWit. However, there are certain differences between the two address formats.

In this detailed blog, we will take you through a comprehensive guide that discusses the two terms in detail while understanding the basic differences between them.

What is SegWit?

In our discussion about SegWit vs Native SegWit (Bech32), let’s start with the conceptual meaning of SegWit. The total number of digital signatures accounts for nearly 65% ​​of the total space on the blockchain. This situation is for any given transaction on the blockchain. The segregated witness address essentially facilitates the reduction of space consumption by managing the data of a given signature. It also transfers the signatures from the input structure to the final stage of the transaction.

How does SegWit work?

The mechanism of action of segregated witness (SegWit) addresses starts with:

  • A transaction contains the wallet addresses of the sender and receiver.

  • The second part of the transaction contains the data and the signature. Segregated witness addresses delete and isolate data from the main block, which reduces the overall transaction size. This is how transactions require less space, which enhances scope for more transactions per block.
  • Once this is done, the segregated witness address fixes the remaining bugs in the Bitcoin protocol allowing users to change transaction hashes. When there is a change in a single character, there is a corresponding change in the rest of the transaction hash.
  • As soon as the signatures are removed from the transaction data, no further changes are required in the existing transaction ID.

What advantages does it offer?

Segregated witness addresses come with a lot of advantages for users.

  • First, it is a simple and effective solution to most problems in the Bitcoin protocol, including transaction fees and operational inefficiencies.
  • Second, witness addresses are segregated allowing users to make more transactions without affecting the overall size of the Bitcoin blockchain as a whole.
  • Users can trade Bitcoin at a cheaper rate, hence higher transaction speed.
  • Plus, there’s always a good range of new and exciting developments in its arena. This is because Bitcoin is one of the cryptocurrencies used by many people due to its popularity.
  • At the same time, a lot of users face the problem of scalability. This is exactly where segregated witness addresses help.

What are the associated complications?

While some benefits come with segregated witness addresses, it also has various complications that users need to be aware of.

Firstly, it does not allow miners to make large profits because the backing system includes witness data side chains, which hinders the scope of fee revenue generation.

Second, this particular protocol doesn’t go far enough to solve the problem of scalability; This makes it a short-term solution to long-term problems. Some Bitcoin miners agree that there are big changes to the Bitcoin blockchain size but how transactions are handled is equally as problematic in the long run.

Read More:   Crypto Trading Vs. Forex Trading- A Detailed Guide

Also, it could cause a split in the entire Bitcoin community due to the constant disagreements surrounding its use.

What is Native SegWit?

Native segregated witness addresses (Bech32) are equally compatible with segregated witness addresses (SegWit). Address strings in Bech32 always start with bc1, which gives it a distinct format.

Initially, the developers implemented it as part of a proposal to improve Bitcoin but later various addresses were integrated along with the core ones. Coming to its format and structure, it has changed a lot from the early developments. It now uses mixed capitalization because the initial addresses are difficult to type and often prone to input errors during transactions.

What is its mechanism of action?

The mechanism of action of root segregated witness addresses is quite similar but at the same time different from SegWit.

As soon as a transaction is initiated from the sender’s end, the associated codes and transaction data are stored on the database and immediately transferred to the sender’s end. The script code and associated characters are recorded on a separate expansion block. Therefore, the decentralized structure provides enough safety and security for both ends. As soon as the transaction is complete and the Bitcoins are transferred to the destination wallet, the data is recorded and shared with the server.

What benefits does it provide to users?

  • Compared to other segregated witness addresses, Bech32 has relatively lower transaction fees.

  • There is also less chance of errors when sending and receiving Bitcoins through separate witness addresses.
  • Additionally, with Bech32 addresses, users can also identify characters associated with their transactions that are potentially incorrect. Thus, users have a safe and secure transaction experience without any hassle on the blockchain.

Are there any downsides?

One of the biggest downsides of separate witness addresses is that it’s not fully compatible with legacy software. This is also the reason why users cannot get verification messages in every software. In addition, minors are often unable to make large profits because there are lower transaction fees included in transactions.

What is the main difference between SegWit and Native SegWit?

Now that we know the meaning of these two terms, now let’s continue the discussion about SegWit vs Native SegWit (Bech32) and reflect the difference between these two. When comparing two types of Bitcoin address formats, it is essential to consider different factors and then see what works better with one and fails in the other.

Although both SegWit and Native SegWit offer a lot of features to the users, there are some differences between them. The mechanism behind transactions is quite different in segregated witness addresses and legacy addresses.

Here are some other differences that give one advantage over the other –

Read More:   2020-W Uncirculated American Silver Eagle Released

Wallet Support

One of the biggest differences between SegWit and Native SegWit is the wallet support that users get. Regarding the facility to send and receive Bitcoin, both Bitcoin address formats allow users to do so. You can easily send or receive Bitcoins in your wallet using address formats.

However, one key difference between these two methods is that unlike Native, SegWit moves all data in Bitcoin blocks, keeping the signatures of all transactions together. It allows more and more transactions to take place in the same space while maintaining a level of security on the Bitcoin blockchain. It uses different addresses and different third-party wallets to facilitate transactions. However, users need to check if the preferred wallet option provider supports all types of address formats.

Transaction fee

If there is one factor underlying the difference between the two, it is the transaction costs involved.

  • Users get a number of benefits with SegWit as it allows them to send Bitcoins with lower transaction fees. Fees are lower because it is based on the speed and size of the transaction which reduces the total effective size.
  • However, if the user uses Native SegWit, the overall transaction costs are relatively lower than it used to be when sending Bitcoins from an old address. In other words, users get more benefits with Native SegWit.

It is also the main reason why many blockchain wallet providers have set their default setting to Native SegWit as the receiving address because users enjoy lower fees whenever they receive Bitcoins in their wallets. .

Additionally, it is essential for users to know that if they received Bitcoin previously on old addresses in their wallet, it is likely to remain on the old addresses until they send it back. This usually happens because transferring Bitcoins from one wallet to another increases the overall transaction fees.

Efficiency in operation

One key difference between the two is the effective range in the transaction. The SegWit (separated witness) address format and provides much better effective range than traditional legacy formats. This happens because the witness addresses are segregated allowing for the separation of signatures each time a transaction occurs in relation to the original transaction data. Due to this separation, any user using a segregated witness address will pay lower transaction fees and experience better transaction efficiency than the old address.

In addition, users can experience faster transactions if it involves segregated witness addresses which also comes with the improved ability of blocks. This happens because blocks can store data for more transactions with segregated witness addresses when compared to older address formats. Segregated witness addresses also represent a greater range of improvements in block size, providing better user efficiency compared to older address formats.

Safe and secure

In terms of safety and security of transactions, segregated witness addresses are a much better choice as it involves separating signatures from transaction data. Due to the separation, there is more scope to improve security while transferring Bitcoins from one wallet to another. In addition, it is difficult for hackers to track transaction signatures due to isolated entities, which is an added benefit. On the other hand, naturally segregated witness addresses also present a lot of scope for improved safety and security as there is a new address format for each transaction. In a nutshell, users get enhanced security features with both options.

Read More:   Blockchain Council Teams up with CoinDCX to Launch Certified Cryptocurrency ExpertTM (CCE)& Certified Cryptocurrency TraderTM (CCT)


Format is another basis for distinguishing segregated witness addresses from legacy addresses. The segregated witness address is the most common Bitcoin address format that is easy to use with any business or wallet support. It usually starts with the number 3 and consists of 26 to 36 characters. In addition, it leverages the P2SH script for basic functions and can also support non-native segregated witness transactions by complying with recommended cryptographic standards. On the other hand, Native SegWit presents to beat the difference from generic styles and its format usually starts with bc1.

Who is the winner?

With reference to discussion regarding SegWit vs Native SegWit (Bech32), it can be said that SegWit is much better in terms of the improvements it has seen. It offers faster transaction speeds with low fees along with improved scalability. Users have improved error detection prospects.

In addition, the segregated witness address format also allows you to detect any ranges for improvement and identify areas with better readability by presenting the address in lowercase. Therefore, it gives users a lot of benefits compared to the original SegWit.

Last word

One final note, obviously in our debate about SegWit vs Native SegWit (Bech32) that SegWit presents a set of promising features for users compared to its competitors. A comparison of these popular Bitcoin address formats along with an in-depth understanding of their respective meanings creates good scope to distinguish between the two. The difference in their features also represents their revolutionary journey as a solution to the problems with existing legacy address formats. Both types of address formats help increase block-side efficiency in addition to meeting the volume of transactions in each block.

Last , Bunny Talk sent you details about the topic “SegWit vs Native SegWit (Bech32) : A Comprehensive Guide –❤️️”.Hope with useful information that the article “SegWit vs Native SegWit (Bech32) : A Comprehensive Guide -” It will help readers to be more interested in “SegWit vs Native SegWit (Bech32) : A Comprehensive Guide – [ ❤️️❤️️ ]”.

Posts “SegWit vs Native SegWit (Bech32) : A Comprehensive Guide –” posted by on 2022-06-28 12:44:32. Thank you for reading the article at

Back to top button